Child prostitution is a gravely serious offense in Arizona, carrying stringent legal consequences. Feldman & Royle, trusted Phoenix child prostitution lawyers, provide expert defense, emphasizing the importance of understanding these serious charges under Arizona law. In Arizona, child prostitution involves engaging in, offering, or soliciting sexual acts with a person under the age of 18 in exchange for anything of value. The law is stringent, and the implications of such charges are profound, both legally and personally.
In Arizona, child prostitution is governed by A.R.S. § 13-3212. It is a felony offense, and the law does not require proof of knowledge of the minor’s age as a defense. This means that claiming ignorance of the minor’s age is not a valid defense in court. Feldman & Royle point out that the severity of the punishment varies based on the age of the child, with harsher penalties for cases involving younger children.
Feldman & Royle advises that if you’re accused of child prostitution charges in Arizona, you have the right to legal representation. It’s crucial to seek Phoenix child prostitution lawyers who are experienced in handling these sensitive cases under Arizona’s laws. Trust Feldman & Royle for your defense. You are entitled to due process, including the right to challenge the prosecution’s evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and present your defense.
Child prostitution charges in Arizona are among the most serious criminal allegations an individual can face. The state’s laws treat such offenses with extreme severity, often carrying lengthy prison sentences, mandatory registration as a sex offender, and a lifetime of social and professional consequences if convicted. Because of the high stakes, it is essential to understand both the nature of these charges and the potential defenses that may be available.
While every case is unique, several defense strategies may apply depending on the facts:
Law enforcement investigations can involve undercover operations, surveillance, or online sting operations. In some cases, the accused may have been misidentified as the person involved in the alleged conduct. Video footage, digital evidence, and eyewitness testimony can be analyzed to establish that the defendant was not the individual in question.
In some situations, the accused may not have known—and had no reasonable way of knowing—that the individual was under the age of 18. While Arizona law is strict on this issue, demonstrating a genuine and reasonable belief that the person was an adult could help in negotiations or sentencing considerations.
Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officers or agents induce a person to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed. In child prostitution cases, this might involve overly aggressive sting operations where officers cross the line from investigation into persuasion or coercion. If successful, this defense can result in a complete dismissal of charges.
The prosecution must prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. If there are inconsistencies in the evidence—such as unreliable witness statements, lack of credible proof of exchange of value, or missing digital data—a defense attorney can argue that the case does not meet the required legal standard.
If the accused’s rights were violated during the investigation—such as unlawful search and seizure, lack of a proper warrant, or denial of the right to an attorney—evidence obtained through these violations may be suppressed, significantly weakening the prosecution’s case.
Unfortunately, false accusations can arise in cases involving minors, sometimes due to personal conflicts, misunderstandings, or third-party influence. A thorough investigation into the accuser’s credibility, motives, and prior statements can uncover inconsistencies that cast doubt on the allegations.
Defenses in Arizona child prostitution cases are complex and require a nuanced approach. Our defense lawyers in Phoenix at Feldman & Royle may explore defenses such as mistaken identity, entrapment, or the lack of evidence to prove the transactional nature of the alleged act. Each case requires a tailored defense strategy, considering the severe penalties at stake.
No tags assigned to this post.
